discuss: Re: SCO's response to HP


Previous by date: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 Re: SCO's response to HP, Mark Komarinski
Next by date: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 CVS Document On the Web, Charles Curley
Previous in thread: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 Re: SCO's response to HP, Mark Komarinski
Next in thread: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 Re: SCO's response to HP, Salvador Peralta

Subject: Re: OT: SCO's response to HP
From: Howard Shane ####@####.####
Date: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000
Message-Id: <3F72F1B7.2010308@austin.rr.com>

Evgueni Tzvetanov wrote:
> It's not only that, but just look at their stock price... Why do you
> think they are so desperate to get someone?

Then again, it might have nothing to do with Linux at all, and
everything to do with the stock price:

http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Aug/08122003/business/83193.asp

I'm inclined to think Linux is just a convenient whipping-boy, given how
weak the evidence seems to be and how American business ethics have gone
into the toilet lately.

hs


Previous by date: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 Re: SCO's response to HP, Mark Komarinski
Next by date: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 CVS Document On the Web, Charles Curley
Previous in thread: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 Re: SCO's response to HP, Mark Komarinski
Next in thread: 25 Sep 2003 13:46:26 -0000 Re: SCO's response to HP, Salvador Peralta


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.