discuss: DocBook number of elements rant


Previous by date: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 docbook subset, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 Re: DocBook number of elements rant, David Braun
Previous in thread: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 Re: DocBook number of elements rant, David Braun
Next in thread: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 Re: DocBook number of elements rant, David Braun

Subject: re: DocBook number of elements rant
From: "David Braun" ####@####.####
Date: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000
Message-Id: <19412-24023@sneakemail.com>

On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 14:55, Greg Ferguson wrote:
> The only mark-up the LDP enforces is a found in the <arcticleinfo> 
> or <bookinfo> area of one's document. This is where the majority of
> meta-data is found.

> E.g., Saqib Ali just pointed out the Simplified DocBook (thanks,
> > Saqib!).  Is that acceptable to the LDP?
> 
> As long as it's a proper subset of some version of DocBook, it should
> work fine. The public id ("<!DOCTYPE...>") may need to be tweaked
> to satisfy our publishing mechanism, but other than that it should
> work fine.

OK, well, I was tempted to use the Simplified DocBook but I won't since
you said the only mark-up enforced by the LDP is in the <articleinfo>. 
Simplified DocBook breaks LDP's <articleinfo> (e.g., <affiliation> does
not allow <address>).

David



Previous by date: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 docbook subset, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 Re: DocBook number of elements rant, David Braun
Previous in thread: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 Re: DocBook number of elements rant, David Braun
Next in thread: 23 Aug 2003 00:00:34 -0000 Re: DocBook number of elements rant, David Braun


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.