discuss: Docbook, Xml, Jade etc.


Previous by date: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Re: Linux dictionary, Tabatha Marshall
Next by date: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Revised Scanner-HOWTO available for viewing, Howard Shane
Previous in thread: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Re: Docbook, Xml, Jade etc., Tabatha Marshall
Next in thread: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Re: Docbook, Xml, Jade etc., Martin WHEELER

Subject: RE: Docbook, Xml, Jade etc.
From: Y Giridhar Appaji Nag ####@####.####
Date: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000
Message-Id: <E595F3D1FBD61244A9F8ECF0B7A0EF5C0F38DE@ubiinmbx.ubinetics.co.in>

Simon Anderson wrote:
> Martin Brown's quick overview got me up and going in less than five
> minutes. From there I have been working away with the procedure that
> you describe here.
> 
> Amazing that Martin can do for me in one email and five minutes what
> the Author Guide couldn't in six frustrating hours.

I find a lot of queries regarding getting DocBook/[SGML, XML] working
on these mailing lists ... but strangely, I have never had any problem
with getting them working for me.

All I had to do was to install the right rpm/deb package (and this is
as simple as doing rpm -i list-of-rpms-with-the-word-"docbook"-in-them
or apt-get install docbook-utils)

All my .sgml or .xml files would be rendered to all beautiful formats
using the docbook2html, docbook2txt, docbook2pdf etc. scripts. Really,
I never bothered to look into jade, dssl, whatever. I don't even know
how these tools work. They just work fine for me as far as authoring
documents is concerned.

Try the above once and let me know if it doesn't work for you. And, as
several people have already mentioned on the list, you can even submit
a document in .txt/.html format, someone or the other will do the markup
for you. We also have things like http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~ppadala/tidy/ 

	Giridhar

--
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag        ####@####.####

Not throwing out the baby with the bath-water doesn't mean that
you cannot improve the system. I'm only arguing against stupid
people who think they need a revolution to improve - most real
improvements are evolutionary. - Linus Torvalds

an individual are not necessarily those of UbiNetics

Previous by date: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Re: Linux dictionary, Tabatha Marshall
Next by date: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Revised Scanner-HOWTO available for viewing, Howard Shane
Previous in thread: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Re: Docbook, Xml, Jade etc., Tabatha Marshall
Next in thread: 28 Jul 2003 11:48:10 -0000 Re: Docbook, Xml, Jade etc., Martin WHEELER


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.