discuss: feedbacks on my documents
Subject:
Re: feedbacks on my documents
From:
John Tapsell ####@####.####
Date:
19 Jun 2003 08:25:37 -0000
Message-Id: <20030619092645.A11578@eng002.cs.man.ac.uk>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:28:43AM -0700, David Lawyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:02:27PM +0100, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I authored the following documents
> >
> > LDP FAQ - i would like to cover more material if
> > necessary and make it comprehensive.does it lack
> > anything now?
>
> There are a lot of things wrong with it. Such an FAQ should have been
> written by volunteers that have followed the mailing list for some time
> and understand more about LDP.
Well can we compare against your version please?
Then decide which is better.
You make some good points for enhancement, but I fail
to see why you deliver the points in such a nasty way.
He tried, it ain't perfect, and he _asked for suggestions_ showing he is
willing to put in the time to make it better.
So ease up!
JohnFlux
