discuss: XML template use
Subject:
Re: XML template use
From:
David Merrill ####@####.####
Date:
17 Mar 2001 02:05:14 -0000
Message-Id: <20010316210406.B25141@lupercalia.net>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:04:11PM -0800, Steven Peck wrote:
> Greetings again all,
>
> Well, I am busily slogging my way through books and such with XML and
> watching the other discussion on checking xml versions and such, learned a
> lot. Making progress on enlightenment.
>
> I have another question. Would it be appropriate for me to use the source
> of the xml version of the LDP-Authors-Guide as a template for writing my
> own? The copyright stuff confuses me all to pieces, as does wether it would
> be appropriate. I've been looking at the source for a few days now, and it
> looks feasable from my point of view.
>
> Trying to difference out the sgml templates vs xml depreciated tags(??)
> makes my head hurt. I'd rather just concentrate on the XML stuff and work
> from an existing 'known good' document.
Feel free to use the LAG as a template, and if you run into problems
then let us know. We want it to be a paragon of proper docbook usage.
Bug reports help.
:-)
There are other templates available.
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Finger me for my public key
Standards are crucial. And the best thing about standards is: there are
so ____many to choose from!
