discuss: Re: Terminology Base Proposal
Subject:
Re: Terminology Base Proposal
From:
"alpha1429" ####@####.####
Date:
7 May 2003 14:19:54 -0000
Message-Id: <Law15-DAV17G5aYY61L00007e51@hotmail.com>
Hi all,
I 'm very close to completion of an initial draft but would like to know
whether
people thought the database should include just Linux terms (current state)
or
whether it should be a full blown dictionary on computing in general as
well.
By the way, to the LDPWN guys. I am a male =)
Binh.
Machtelt Garrels wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, alpha1p 142936 wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone out there,
>>
>> I think I am a few weeks from having my database completed (as well
>> as conversion and update of my LHFS Guide to XML) but I would like
>> to know whether people think there is indeed a place for it within
>> the LDP since its quite different from anything else in the LDP at
>> the moment.
>
> It would be a good reference both for authors and translators, to
> unify
> our documents. Something to build into that XML editor someone was
> going
> to write? ;-)
>
> Tille.
>
> - --
>
> My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.soti.org
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE+slV6sIIUbMXbBA8RAvTUAJ0VRaudIH04MrFeW70Czi+MrP283wCcCk7k
> Dwi9rxaOoviq44pkNMXiUtw=
> =3a/P
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
