discuss: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO


Previous by date: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Howard Shane
Next by date: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Evgueni Tzvetanov
Previous in thread: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Howard Shane
Next in thread: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Evgueni Tzvetanov

Subject: Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO
From: Evgueni Tzvetanov ####@####.####
Date: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000
Message-Id: <3E84E436.5060103@comcast.net>

Sounds good to me. I guess if a volunteers are no able to support their 
documents, TLDP should decide to ask for other volunteers, who have the 
skills to support. It is important to have adequate information for at 
least the most important things.

I can help with any info you may need to SB-4200, I am using one quite 
well with a Linux router and a 5 port hub to support my home network.

Regards and good luck!
ET.

Howard Shane wrote:

> The initial thread discussing this document raised the same question. 
> It was decided that a mini-HOWTO was the best approach because of the 
> hardware specificity of the information.  Unofficially, the fact that 
> the maintainer of the Cable-Modem HOWTO is AWOL probably had at least 
> as much to do with the decision...
>
> Which brings up another question: what is the policy of the TLDP if a 
> contributor of a document vanishes?  How stale does the doc have to be 
> before becoming 'unmaintained?'
>
> hs
>
> Evgueni Tzvetanov wrote:
>
>> Hi Howard,
>>
>> As mentioned for other documents (including mine), I want to just ask 
>> if your document could be included in the existing Cable-Modem-HOWTO? 
>> It contains a lot of information, which you can update and add to.
>>
>> I think that minimizing the number of documents is a good approach, 
>> without diminishing anyone's contribution.
>>
>> Regards!
>> Evgueni
>>
>> Howard Shane wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Since I've submitted this document, I've had several emails from 
>>> people with later models of this device that have contributed more 
>>> information about features, but the initial setup for all the models 
>>> is the same as outlined in my draft. I would like to include the 
>>> extra information perhaps as another appendix; are there any 
>>> objections to this, as well as changing the title of the document to 
>>> the Motorola Surfboard 4100 + 4200 Series Cablemodem HOWTO?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> hs
>>>
>>> Greg Ferguson wrote:
>>>
>>>> For review:
>>>>
>>>>  Motorola SurfBoard 4100 Cable Modem-HOWTO
>>>>  Howard Shane  ####@####.####
>>>>  http://ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO.html
>>>>
>>>> In progress:
>>>>
>>>>  http://www.tldp.org/authors/inprogress.html
>>>>
>>>> Please respond directly to the author with any comments.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> -- 
>>>> Greg Ferguson    * SGI principal engr / LDP contributor
>>>> SGI Tech Pubs    * http://techpubs.sgi.com/ | gferg(at)sgi.com
>>>> Linux Doc Project* http://tldp.org/         | gferg(at)metalab.unc.edu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________
>>> http://lists.tldp.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________
>> http://lists.tldp.org/
>>
>>
>
>
>



Previous by date: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Howard Shane
Next by date: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Evgueni Tzvetanov
Previous in thread: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Howard Shane
Next in thread: 29 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0000 Re: for review: SB-4100-Modem-HOWTO, Evgueni Tzvetanov


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.