discuss: Planning to publish new document
Subject:
Re: Planning to publish new document
From:
Evgueni Tzvetanov ####@####.####
Date:
6 Mar 2003 13:05:51 -0000
Message-Id: <3E6747A2.3020106@comcast.net>
Thanks Dave,
I hope it did not sound as an attack or something. This was not an
attempt to slow down your efforts to make the things better, but rather
a reminder that some times too much information is not that good and
that there are alternatives, which people might select, regardless of
any argument against their choice. :)
David Lawyer wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:35:47PM -0500, Evgueni Tzvetanov wrote:
>
>
>>Dave,
>>
>>I think that everybody in this group has the idea of wiki, only I think
>>that it is up the the LDP responsible people to decide and it is not a
>>good idea to make a campaign out of this. If you want to make a proposal
>>to the board, I guess I think you have to address them directly with a
>>proposal and of course to make a nice argument and stand your position.
>>
>>
>
>Since the people making decisions about LDP supposedly read this list,
>this is the place to make such proposals. I think that it's OK to make
>a campaign out it if such a campaign is based on logical reasoning. If
>people don't "campaign" for their ideas, such ideas may never get
>implemented. But although I presented anti-wiki arguments, I mainly did
>so to balance the email containing pro-wiki arguments. I see both
>strengths and weaknesses in wiki. I think that authors who want to
>have a wiki version of their doc online and then revise their doc based
>on wiki input, should be free to do so. And Lampadas should let them do
>this.
>
>
>
>>Even if we are convinced that it is the best, other people might think
>>it is not true and could not be convinced. Besides there is freedom to
>>chose of at least 3 methods of writing your document.
>>
>>
>
> David Lawyer
>
>______________________
>http://lists.tldp.org/
>
>
>
>
