discuss: Planning to publish new document


Previous by date: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Re: Planning to publish new document, Evgueni Tzvetanov
Next by date: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Archiving the TLDP mailing lists, HOW-TO's, Mini HOW-TO's, and Guides..., Corey Reichle
Previous in thread: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Re: Planning to publish new document, Evgueni Tzvetanov
Next in thread: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Re: Planning to publish new document, Evgueni Tzvetanov

Subject: Re: Planning to publish new document
From: Tabatha Persad ####@####.####
Date: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000
Message-Id: <1046124844.4663.40.camel@mysticchild>

Well, how about this:  since the document is very task-specific, right
down to the versions, maybe a mini-HOWTO would be more appropriate?  

It would be nice to see a master document with some of this eventually
incorporated, but a good point was brought up about not straining too
hard to document Oracle earlier.  When writing a HOWTO involving
Windows, I think most authors would not bother to document anything more
than what was required for their task, which makes sense.  That's
something to bear in mind when working with proprietary software.

Consolidating everything into one main document would require one or all
of the authors of the existing Oracle-related documentation to make some
decisions.  That also raises the question, when does a HOWTO become a
Guide?  The scope of the document should be considered.  

For example, how to set up, say, a specific network card on a Linux
system was a mini-HOWTO, how to set up multiple types of cards on
multiple Linux distributions would be a HOWTO, and Network
Administration would be a Guide. Thus, the broader the subject, the
broader the document.  

I would recommend an author sum up the scope of his/her document in a
single sentence or two; it should often become clear at that point what
category it seems to fit.

I trust the discussion list most of all, and think this is the best way
to figure things out, because every document is, after all, unique!

Nothing here is meant to be taken as decision-making or preaching - I
simply find this an easy way to understand how things work, and if I'm
off, I hope someone'll tell me so! ;)

Thanks,

Tabatha




On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 11:57, Evgueni Tzvetanov wrote:
> Thanks Steve,
> 
> It is true, that 8i and 9i have similar installation processes, but then 
> I have installed the following versions 8.1.5, 8.1.7 and 9.2.0.1.0 and 
> in all the cases there were things, which were different. I don't mean 
> the installer, but the "hacks" you have to do around it when you have to 
> investigate undocumented problem while the in process...
> 
> I am open to suggestions on a single Oracle installation document, but 
> as I said I am not a DBA. I can contribute with whatever knowledge and 
> experience I have. I think that we can work together, instead of making 
> a fight out of it :) We all know how painful sometimes an Oracle 
> installation could be.
> 
> Regards!
> Evgueni
> 
> Stephen Darlington wrote:
> 
> >> For each version of Oracle the installation is unique.
> >
> >
> > I don't think that's true, and that's why I'd argue against it (and 
> > the  Oracle on RedHat 7 document if I'd had the chance!).
> >
> > The Oracle 7 HOWTO has a place as there was never an official version  
> > of Oracle so it's a bit of a hack. You could possibly argue that it's  
> > not necessary now.
> >
> > The 8i HOWTO has a place as installing it was a huge pain in the 
> > first  place even though Oracle theoretically supported it. Following 
> > Oracle's  documentation would get you a core dump (if you were lucky). 
> > Again, you  could argue that it's not terribly contemporary now, but 
> > you couldn't  bring all the versions up to date without losing a lot 
> > of information.
> >
> > The 9i installer is the same as the 8i one but with less bugs (I  
> > managed to install it without consulting any documentation).
> >
> >> I think that these HOWTOs are written to be much less complex than  
> >> Oracle Installation Guide and more like an example, not a guide to  
> >> easy installation.
> >
> >
> > As I suggest above, mine was written to make it possible to use 
> > Oracle  on Linux without paying vast amounts of money to Oracle 
> > support. I  think we should be furthering and advocating Linux not 
> > giving Oracle  free documentation and marketing.
> >
> > Just my 2d worth...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --> Stephen
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> > ----
> >                     Stephen Darlington (www.zx81.org.uk)
> >                                   "I long for a grapefruit"
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> > ----
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
-- 
Tabatha Persad
Web: www.merlinmonroe.com
Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org)
Gnu Writing Movement Contributor (http://gwm.gnu.org)
Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org)




Previous by date: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Re: Planning to publish new document, Evgueni Tzvetanov
Next by date: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Archiving the TLDP mailing lists, HOW-TO's, Mini HOW-TO's, and Guides..., Corey Reichle
Previous in thread: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Re: Planning to publish new document, Evgueni Tzvetanov
Next in thread: 24 Feb 2003 22:12:45 -0000 Re: Planning to publish new document, Evgueni Tzvetanov


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.