discuss: Change Logs (Was Re: db2omf)


Previous by date: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: SGML Processor, Dan York
Next by date: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: DocBook tutorial, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: Change Logs (Was Re: db2omf), Mark Komarinski
Next in thread: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: Change Logs (Was Re: db2omf), David Lawyer

Subject: Re: Change Logs (Was Re: db2omf)
From: Dan York ####@####.####
Date: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000
Message-Id: <20010312110117.B14099@e-smith.com>

Mark,

> I'd rather we keep using <revision> since readers can see it easily
> and we can control how long it gets.  It's a duplication of effort, but
> one that will look nicer in the long run.

Oops.. misunderstanding on my part. I thought David was talking about
his own internal (to the document) changelog.  I didn't realize he was
talking about a viewable changelog. Sorry about that.  For a viewable
one, yes, I would definitely want to control that in the manner you suggest.

Dan


Previous by date: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: SGML Processor, Dan York
Next by date: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: DocBook tutorial, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: Change Logs (Was Re: db2omf), Mark Komarinski
Next in thread: 12 Mar 2001 16:01:52 -0000 Re: Change Logs (Was Re: db2omf), David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.