discuss: Reviewing new documents WAS: Re: Beginning of outline for policies
Subject:
Re: Reviewing new documents WAS: Re: Beginning of outline for policies
From:
Tabatha Persad ####@####.####
Date:
16 May 2002 22:04:26 -0000
Message-Id: <20020516220400.HQMR19355.sccrmhc03.attbi.com@there>
Thanks for pointing that out, Joy. You have provided much more
clarity on what falls under this type of review!
I was trying to get at the concept of "readability" but you did a
much better job defining it and explaining it as "usability".
On Thursday 16 May 2002 17:55, Joy Y Goodreau wrote:
> Language reviews are grammar, sentence level fixes, errors or
> miscommunications in logic and order, as well as for missing
> concepts or ideas (out of context diagrams, missing fundamental
> steps or definitions, bulleted lists or no lists where numeric
> lists are easier to use and associate with steps). Language
> reviews are really "usability" reviews with strong biases for
> correct grammar and logic. Grammar and syntax alone are not enough
> for a successful language review.
