discuss: HOWTOs and Mini-HOWTOs
Subject:
Re: HOWTOs and Mini-HOWTOs
From:
"Joy Y Goodreau" ####@####.####
Date:
16 May 2002 14:26:54 -0000
Message-Id: <OF9C278108.B6798616-ON85256BBB.004F2238@pok.ibm.com>
I agree that the two should be merged. I think this makes room for Quick
References and FAQ distinctions. It was interesting to hear the historical
context behind the difference. The difference between mini-HOWTOs and
HOWTOs was not obvious to me.
joy
Joy Y. Goodreau
Linux Information Developer
LDP Collections Editor
Ofc. (512) 838-4118
T/L 678-4118
####@####.####
"Greg Ferguson"
####@####.#### To: Gilles Lamiral ####@####.#### ####@####.####
um.sgi.com> cc:
Subject: Re: HOWTOs and Mini-HOWTOs
05/15/2002 07:50
PM
On May 15, 10:38pm, Gilles Lamiral wrote:
> Subject: Re: HOWTOs and Mini-HOWTOs
>
> > An observation; the distinction between HOWTOs and Mini-HOWTOs doesn't
> > appear to be a useful one.
>
> They should be at least in the same directory. It is boring to
> search the same things in several places.
I'm all for merging them together. I think people tend to
miss out on the mini's when they invoke the HOWTO Index,
which is most likely a primary jump-off point (http://tldp.org/HOWTO/).
They probably never click to get to the mini-HOWTO index.
The filenames/titles can stay the same, but I'm all for simplifying
the overall layout.
So other than for historical reasons, are there any other reasons why
the hierarchy should be maintained?
--
Greg Ferguson * SGI principal engr / LDP contributor
SGI Tech Pubs * http://techpubs.sgi.com/ | gferg(at)sgi.com
Linux Doc Project* http://tldp.org/ | gferg(at)metalab.unc.edu
______________________
http://lists.tldp.org/