discuss: Confusion about GNU FDL


Previous by date: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Charles Curley
Next by date: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Charles Curley
Next in thread: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Greg Ferguson

Subject: Re: Confusion about GNU FDL
From: Gregory Leblanc ####@####.####
Date: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000
Message-Id: <1021481869.1658.23.camel@peecee>

On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 09:52, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:21:44AM -0400, Greg Ferguson wrote:
> > On May 15,  7:29am, David Merrill wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: Confusion about GNU FDL
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:37:26PM +0930, Glen Turner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I wrote the second edition of the Remote-Serial-Console-HOWTO.  It
> > seems
> > > > to have been reasonably well received.
> > > >
> > > > It's licensed under the LDP License, which apparently is non-free.
> >  I'd
> > > > like to fix that.
> > > >
> > > > I looked at the GNU FDL and I don't understand it at all.
> > > >
> > > > What are the recommended Invariant Sections, Front Cover Texts and
> > Back
> > > > Cover Texts for a typical LDP document?
> > >
> > > I would ask you to have none of those sections. They are not really
> > > useful unless you are an actual publisher who intends to sell the
> > > book.
> > 
> > Here's the GFDL license DocBook XML/SGML snippet:
> > 
> >   <!-- Legal Sections -->
> >   <sect2 id="copyright">
> >     <title>Copyright and License</title>
> > 
> >     <!-- The LDP recommends, but doesn't require, the GFDL -->
> >     <para>
> >      This document, <emphasis>Sample XML HOWTO</emphasis>,
> >      is copyrighted (c) 2002 by <emphasis>author_name</emphasis>.
> >      Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
> >      document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation
> >      License, Version 1.1 or any later version published
> >      by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections,
> >      with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts.
> >      A copy of the license is available at
> >      <ulink url="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">
> >      http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html</ulink>.
> >     </para>
> >   </sect2>
> 
> Is it unnecessary to put the entire license in your document?

I just had this chat with Richard a month or two ago.  You MUST include
the entire GFDL in your document.
	Greg

-- 
Portland, Oregon, USA.
Please don't copy me on replies to the list.


Previous by date: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Charles Curley
Next by date: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Charles Curley
Next in thread: 15 May 2002 16:58:24 -0000 Re: Confusion about GNU FDL, Greg Ferguson


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.