discuss: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers


Previous by date: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill
Next by date: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill
Next in thread: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill

Subject: Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers
From: ####@####.####
Date: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000
Message-Id: <1887.1021307020@www19.gmx.net>

jdd wrote:
> [...]
> I think we should definitivly not rely on cvs.
> it's much too difficult to use for usual author (me)

OTOH people coming from software development (like me)
feel very limited without. There are even nice GUI
front ends to CVS. And the alternatives are
a) only a single author per project
b) chaos

Anyway, I failed to see description of an anonymous
CVS account (read-only). Is that just a problem with
my eyes?

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net


Previous by date: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill
Next by date: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill
Next in thread: 13 May 2002 16:24:07 -0000 Re: Dealing with poor maintenance by maintainers, David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.