discuss: Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3


Previous by date: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], David Merrill
Next by date: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3, Hal Burgiss
Next in thread: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3, Greg Ferguson

Subject: Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3
From: Hal Burgiss ####@####.####
Date: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000
Message-Id: <20020513113938.J1982@feenix.burgiss.net>

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:56:54AM -0400, Tammy Fox wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:55:03PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:59:06PM -0400, Tammy Fox wrote:
> > > 
> > > This statement is correct. Some of the LDP HOWTOs conflicted
> > > with the official RH docs, and we received several complaints
> > > about the correctness and format of the LDP docs. Thus, it was
> > > decided not to put them on the docs CD.
> > 
> > What is meant by "format" ??? 
> > 
> Some are in text, and some are in HTML. Believe it or not,
> someone complained about it.

AFAIK, they are all available in text and HTML (and other formats, eg
pdf). Or are you saying something got left out at LDP end of things?
This seems a _very_ petty reason. "Correctness", I'd say yes, there is
room for improvement. But if its packaging related, thats easy enough
to fix.


-- 
Hal Burgiss
 

Previous by date: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], David Merrill
Next by date: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3, Hal Burgiss
Next in thread: 13 May 2002 15:39:39 -0000 Re: HOWTO doc's in 7.3, Greg Ferguson


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.