discuss: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]]
Subject:
Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]]
From:
David Merrill ####@####.####
Date:
13 May 2002 15:36:51 -0000
Message-Id: <20020513162811.GD2000@lupercalia.net>
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:25:53PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> > > AFAIK, Roundup is easier to install and maintain than bugzilla...
> >
> > This was first time I even heard about roundup so I won't comment it but
> > I must say that I've found out nothing that is hard with Bugzilla which
> > I installed from the Debian package. Of course, Debian packages often
> > lessen the pain remarkably.
>
> Right :-)
>
> Would bugzilla offer the same "dynamic mailing-lists" feature as roundup.
> It lets people concerned about a bug easily discuss its issues ?
Yes it does, and I understand the new version greatly improved the
mail support, although I don't know personally.
We do need a Bugzilla, and in fact I in this rare case am absolutely
going to insist on it, for Lampadas. Whether and how to use it for
docs is a separate issue, but I *must* have a bug database for the
Lampadas project. I will ask iBiblio if they will host.
--
David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project ####@####.####
Lead Developer http://www.tldp.org
We had five or six major goals: Portability, reliability, extensibility,
compatibility, performance." INTERVIEWER: "Do you think you achieved these
goals?" "We certainly achieved extensibility and portability."
--Mark Lucovsky, NT 1.0 designer, in a Microsoft PR interview
