discuss: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]]


Previous by date: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], Ari Makela
Next by date: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3], Guylhem P Aznar
Previous in thread: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], Ari Makela
Next in thread: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], David Merrill

Subject: Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]]
From: Nicolas Chauvat ####@####.####
Date: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205131423580.435-100000@aries.logilab.fr>

> > AFAIK, Roundup is easier to install and maintain than bugzilla... 
> 
> This was first time I even heard about roundup so I won't comment it but
> I must say that I've found out nothing that is hard with Bugzilla which 
> I installed from the Debian package. Of course, Debian packages often
> lessen the pain remarkably.

Right :-)

Would bugzilla offer the same "dynamic mailing-lists" feature as roundup.
It lets people concerned about a bug easily discuss its issues ?

-- 
Nicolas Chauvat

http://www.logilab.com - "Mais où est donc Ornicar ?" - LOGILAB, Paris (France)


Previous by date: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], Ari Makela
Next by date: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3], Guylhem P Aznar
Previous in thread: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], Ari Makela
Next in thread: 13 May 2002 12:25:54 -0000 Re: Bugzilla? [Was: Re: [tfox@redhat.com: HOWTO doc's in 7.3]], David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.