discuss: time frame for draft review?
Subject:
Re: time frame for draft review?
From:
"Joy Y Goodreau" ####@####.####
Date:
30 Apr 2002 12:48:50 -0000
Message-Id: <OFFBAE36ED.0B03B92A-ON85256BAB.0045B2DA@pok.ibm.com>
This review process discussed in my previous message applies only to _new_
submissions, not revisions of existing documents. So if you submit a new
document to the LDP that has not been published on the site before, yes,
you may wait 5-7 days for us to get comments back to you, so that you can
make corrections and submit again and go live. I anticipate that for some
documents there may be very few suggested changes.
Hopefully we will be able to get to the existing documents soon. Our
reviews of existing documents have fallen off, but we hope to pick them
back up and continue working our way through the database. NOTE: When we
review an existing document, the document stays online through the review
process.
Thanks,
joy
Joy Yokley Goodreau
Linux Information Developer
LDP Collections Editor
Ofc. (512) 838-4118
T/L 678-4118
####@####.####
####@####.####
To: Joy Y Goodreau/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
04/29/2002 08:26 cc: john meshkoff ####@####.#### ####@####.####
PM Subject: Re: time frame for draft review?
Please respond to
dude
are saying it will tkae 5-7 days before updates are posted?
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Joy Y Goodreau wrote:
>Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:08:21 -0500
>From: Joy Y Goodreau ####@####.####
>To: john meshkoff ####@####.####
>Cc: ####@####.####
>Subject: Re: time frame for draft review?
>
>
>Hi John,
>
>As a clarification, we have begun trying to review all new submissions to
>the submit list before publication. Right now this review is mostly for
>readability and organization. As Tabatha mentioned we are anticipating 5 -
>7 days for a review. This will vary. I just finished a 56 page document
>written by one of our ESL authors that took me 8 days. In such cases the
>reviewer of record should contact you and let you know when to anticipate
>the changes.
>
>As another note, we usually do sentence level changes in source, based on
>authors preference and global changes as suggestions to implement before
>publication.
>
>If you have any questions about the process, please feel free to email me.
>
>thanks,
>
>joy
>
>
>Joy Yokley Goodreau
>Linux Information Developer
>LDP Collections Editor
>Ofc. (512) 838-4118
>T/L 678-4118
####@####.####
>
>
>
>
> john meshkoff
> <johnm@sivakalpa. To: discuss Linux Doc
####@####.####
> org> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: time frame for
draft review?
> ####@####.####
> c.net
>
>
> 04/27/2002 01:07
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
>In the LDP author's guide it says:
>
>"Once that part is complete, you may write your documentation in the
>format of your choice and submit a draft to ####@####.#### and
>the draft will be reviewed by an LDP volunteer. In a few short days you
>will get the draft and comments from the volunteer. After applying the
>comments, you may send this version to the ldp-submit list again for
>final submission into the LDP"
>
>I do realize that the active word here is "volunteer", and people are
>busy with more than doing draft reviews, and the list of works in
>progress isn't exactly short. I was just wondering what the realistic
>time frame for having one's submission reviewed is these days.
>
>
>--
>John Meshkoff johnm at sivakalpa dot org
>http://www.sivakalpa.org/
>"I do not know that I know the self fully;
>neither do I know that I know him not" ... from the Upanishads
>
>______________________
>http://lists.tldp.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>______________________
>http://lists.tldp.org/
>
>
______________________
http://lists.tldp.org/
