discuss: SGML / XML


Previous by date: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 netslaves article, David Merrill
Next by date: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Mark Komarinski
Previous in thread: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Nik Clayton
Next in thread: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Mark Komarinski

Subject: Re: SGML / XML
From: David Merrill ####@####.####
Date: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000
Message-Id: <20010308101031.A19345@lupercalia.net>

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:06:14PM -0800, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> >not a requirement (or a "barrier to acceptance" as the case may be),
> >nor do I believe it ever should be.
> 
> It absolutely should be. It is imperative to the growth of any
> organization to have certain standards in place. Debian, Gnome, KDE all
> have specific standards for code and documentation.

Yes, I agree. My point is that we are observably moving toward that
standard with our current policy.

-- 
Dr. David C. Merrill                     http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project                   ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator            http://www.linuxdoc.org
                                       Finger me for my public key

	... with liberty and justice for all ... who can afford it.

Previous by date: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 netslaves article, David Merrill
Next by date: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Mark Komarinski
Previous in thread: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Nik Clayton
Next in thread: 8 Mar 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Mark Komarinski


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.