discuss: SGML / XML
Subject:
Re: SGML / XML
From:
"Greg Ferguson" ####@####.####
Date:
7 Mar 2001 23:17:15 -0000
Message-Id: <10103071811.ZM22718@hoop.timonium.sgi.com>
On Mar 7, 3:06pm, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> Subject: Re: SGML / XML
> >not a requirement (or a "barrier to acceptance" as the case may be),
> >nor do I believe it ever should be.
>
> It absolutely should be. It is imperative to the growth of any
> organization to have certain standards in place. Debian, Gnome, KDE all
> have specific standards for code and documentation.
Absolutely (wrt the standards remark); and we do have standards:
- documented in the LDP Author Guide
- exhibited by the available SGML documents templates,
- and as noted by:
"The LDP officially supports:
SGML - Linuxdoc, DocBook v3.x, DocBook v4.x
XML - DocBook v4.1.2"
r,
Ferg
