discuss: SGML / XML


Previous by date: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill
Next by date: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill
Next in thread: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Greg Ferguson

Subject: Re: SGML / XML
From: Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103071505360.1760-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>

>not a requirement (or a "barrier to acceptance" as the case may be),
>nor do I believe it ever should be.

It absolutely should be. It is imperative to the growth of any
organization to have certain standards in place. Debian, Gnome, KDE all
have specific standards for code and documentation.

W

>
>r,
>Ferg
>

-- 
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt	- http://www.commandprompt.com	</COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.	- http://www.opendocs.org	</PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts 	- http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP		- http://www.linuxdoc.org	</WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--


Previous by date: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill
Next by date: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill
Next in thread: 7 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Greg Ferguson


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.