discuss: SGML / XML


Previous by date: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Poet/Joshua Drake
Next by date: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Poet/Joshua Drake
Next in thread: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill

Subject: Re: SGML / XML
From: "Greg Ferguson" ####@####.####
Date: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000
Message-Id: <10103071551.ZM22430@hoop.timonium.sgi.com>

On Mar 7, 12:17pm, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> Subject: Re: SGML / XML
> >
> >I don't agree.  Especially with linuxdoc where no tags are used for
> >paragraphs.
>
> But we aren't supposed to use Linuxdoc for new Articles.

If the author so chooses, Linuxdoc is fine/accepted. I try to
gently push them in the direction of DocBook, but it's certainly
not a requirement (or a "barrier to acceptance" as the case may be),
nor do I believe it ever should be.

r,
Ferg

Previous by date: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Poet/Joshua Drake
Next by date: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, Poet/Joshua Drake
Next in thread: 7 Mar 2001 20:57:30 -0000 Re: SGML / XML, David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.