discuss: LDP Style discussion (cont.)
Subject:
Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.)
From:
Martin WHEELER ####@####.####
Date:
14 Apr 2002 00:59:32 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204140052420.8515-100000@caxton.startext.demon.co.uk>
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Alexander Bartolich wrote:
> But then I got notice of the "LDP Author Guide" and decided
> to render my stuff with 'ldp.dsl'.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Linux + SGML!
...
> Ok. Enough. I got it working. First class results with
> free software. And I did not have to buy books or pay a hotline.
You are one of the very, very fortunate ones.
(Native intelligence helps, of course.)
> But I really think that if LDP has excessive energy
> it should invest it into quality control and a usability lab.
Hear, fucking hear!
That's the most intelligent thing I've read on this list in a long
while. Thanks for saying it.
--
Martin Wheeler ####@####.#### gpg key 01269BEB @ the.earth.li
P.S. I tried to do what you did. (OK, so it was several years ago.)
i found it so painful I created my own environment from scratch.
