discuss: LDP Style discussion (cont.)


Previous by date: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), M. Leo Cooper
Next by date: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), John R. Daily
Previous in thread: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), M. Leo Cooper
Next in thread: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), John R. Daily

Subject: Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.)
From: Randy Kramer ####@####.####
Date: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000
Message-Id: <3CB33A87.3164@fast.net>

M. Leo Cooper wrote:
> I looked at its TOC, and frankly I'm not all that sure that this type of style
> guide is something for LPD authors to emulate. It appears to be a recipe for
> corporate-speak, for writing the type of manuals that gather dust on the shelf
> and that no sane person would read.

Haven't looked at the TOC, but I do have a comment about the next point:

> " * Avoid Humor 2 "
> I guess that leaves my documents out...

I've learned (am learning?) that humor is often more fun for the writer
than the reader, especially if readers include non-native speakers of
the language.

Randy Kramer

Previous by date: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), M. Leo Cooper
Next by date: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), John R. Daily
Previous in thread: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), M. Leo Cooper
Next in thread: 9 Apr 2002 19:09:14 -0000 Re: LDP Style discussion (cont.), John R. Daily


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.