discuss: suspending and removing docs
Subject:
Re: suspending and removing docs
From:
Gregory Leblanc ####@####.####
Date:
16 Mar 2002 01:50:59 -0000
Message-Id: <1016243417.31024.4.camel@peecee>
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 12:18, David Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:21:17AM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:00, David Merrill wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:28:27PM -0800, Tabatha Persad wrote:
> > > > That sounds like an excellent way to prioritize as well - that is to say, if
> > > > the rating system showed that a particular document needed much revision to
> > > > update it, this may be moved up in the list of high versus low priority.
> > > >
> > > > I have taken a look at the GDP and they have a complex system to track
> > > > revisions and status of the documentation. Is there anything similar at
> > > > LDP?
> > >
> > > If you're speaking of DocTable, our equivalent is the LDP Database.
> > > See db.linuxdoc.org for access to it. It is a work in progress. :-)
> >
> > And the LDP Database is MUCH better than the GNOME DocTable, at least
> > until we finish the re-write. Maybe then I'll have a leg up on David
> > again. :-)
>
> Can the LDP Database serve your needs? I would be a really good thing
> if we could coordinate on these sorts of tools, since our needs
> overlap so much. I'm willing to go quite a long ways in altering the
> design so that it is not LDP specific.
Possibly. I've kinda of designed the next revision of the DocTable to
be more of a "guide" through the writing process, instead of just a bit
table filled with bits. I'll send more on the list, as soon as Ser gets
it running.
Greg
--
Portland, Oregon, USA.
