discuss: LDP Database vs GDP DocTable
Subject:
LDP Database vs GDP DocTable
From:
"Tabatha Persad" ####@####.####
Date:
15 Mar 2002 19:53:02 -0000
Message-Id: <005b01c1cb91$f3bc1290$0928a8c0@voodoochild>
IMHO, now that I've had a look at the LDP Database, I do like the structure
better than what I've seen at GDP. While they have a LOT of information,
it's exhaustive, and seems unnecessarily intricate. But then again, maybe
because I didn't see anything to contribute I didn't delve in as far as I
could have!
I think from what I've seen of the LDP Database it looks very easy to work
with, and nice and straightforward, which is ALWAYS a good thing!
Tabatha
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Leblanc" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: suspending and removing docs
> On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:00, David Merrill wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:28:27PM -0800, Tabatha Persad wrote:
> > > That sounds like an excellent way to prioritize as well - that is to
say, if
> > > the rating system showed that a particular document needed much
revision to
> > > update it, this may be moved up in the list of high versus low
priority.
> > >
> > > I have taken a look at the GDP and they have a complex system to track
> > > revisions and status of the documentation. Is there anything similar
at
> > > LDP?
> >
> > If you're speaking of DocTable, our equivalent is the LDP Database.
> > See db.linuxdoc.org for access to it. It is a work in progress. :-)
>
> And the LDP Database is MUCH better than the GNOME DocTable, at least
> until we finish the re-write. Maybe then I'll have a leg up on David
> again. :-)
> Greg
>
> --
> Portland, Oregon, USA.
>
>
> _________________________
> http://list.linuxdoc.org/
>
