discuss: modularization - was: xml/xsl/dtd-howto
Subject:
Re: modularization - was: xml/xsl/dtd-howto
From:
"John R. Daily" ####@####.####
Date:
4 Dec 2001 14:47:28 -0000
Message-Id: <20011204144728.54027F63@butthead.progeny.com>
At (time_t)1007476659 Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> It works well for us, do any of you think it could be a nice thing for the
> LDP ? Instead of big howtos that are harder to write and update and may
> easily overlap, could we think of a way to get people to maintain sets of
> modules that we would tie together to offer HOWTOs that cover larger
> subjects ? Or would you think the current granularity of the collection of
> HOWTOs is the right one and that HOWTOs are already to be considered as
> modules of the larger LDP library ?
I would strongly suggest that the LDP consider making modules
accessible in such a way that an individual module can be
supplanted by a new one that covers the same material without
breaking URLs embedded in older meta-documents.
See http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI for a discussion of the
inverse problem; it may provide some ideas on how to handle this
one.
--
John R. Daily Progeny Linux Systems
Consultant ####@####.####
Master of the ephemeral epiphany
