discuss: non-free area
Subject:
Re: non-free area
From:
"Greg Ferguson" ####@####.####
Date:
19 Feb 2001 16:32:35 -0000
Message-Id: <10102191126.ZM23546@hoop.timonium.sgi.com>
On Feb 19, 11:23am, David Merrill wrote:
> Subject: Re: non-free area
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:04:24AM -0500, Greg Ferguson wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 7:24pm, David Lawyer wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: non-free area
> > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 08:45:56PM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> > > > The author of the RUTE document asked if we would continue to post
it
> > > > under a non-free area a la debian. Does anyone object to that?
> > >
> > > An alternative would be to simply put a link to it on our site and
> > > keep the RUTE document at a non-LDP site. Otherwise we are using up
> > > more bandwidth and storage for it.
> >
> > I like this approach as well. I added the link here:
> > http://www.linuxdoc.org/docs.html#other
>
> We should keep the non-free separate from the "other" category which
> we previously defined as specialty documents (i.e., reference cards).
> Would you mind adding a new heading for it called "Non-Free"?
Done: http://www.linuxdoc.org/docs.html#nonfree
wrt the Mailing lists subject ("Re: Getting off the list")...
>
> Ferg, can we please add "how to unsubscribe" on mailinfo.html, right
> after the how to subscribe stuff?
Added.
r,
Ferg
