discuss: non-free area
Subject:
Re: non-free area
From:
David Merrill ####@####.####
Date:
19 Feb 2001 16:24:41 -0000
Message-Id: <20010219112342.D4156@lupercalia.net>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:04:24AM -0500, Greg Ferguson wrote:
> On Feb 18, 7:24pm, David Lawyer wrote:
> > Subject: Re: non-free area
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 08:45:56PM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> > > The author of the RUTE document asked if we would continue to post it
> > > under a non-free area a la debian. Does anyone object to that?
> >
> > An alternative would be to simply put a link to it on our site and
> > keep the RUTE document at a non-LDP site. Otherwise we are using up
> > more bandwidth and storage for it.
>
> I like this approach as well. I added the link here:
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/docs.html#other
We should keep the non-free separate from the "other" category which
we previously defined as specialty documents (i.e., reference cards).
Would you mind adding a new heading for it called "Non-Free"?
Thanks!
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Finger me for my public key
Behold, the fool saith, "Put not all thine eggs in the one basket"--which is
but a manner of saying, "Scatter your money and your attention;" but the wise
man saith, "Put all your eggs in the one basket and--WATCH THAT BASKET."
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
