discuss: The various tools available
Subject:
Re: The various tools available
From:
"Vivek Venugopalan" ####@####.####
Date:
13 Sep 2001 16:56:00 -0000
Message-Id: <00c401c13c74$e9b76df0$0201a8c0@ntbox>
So is xsltproc and libxml is the most preferred way to process them now? I
am amazed by the performance numbers that is being quoted here.
Vivek
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Fleck" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: The various tools available
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 06:33:13PM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> >
> > 7. xsltproc and libxml from Gnome. I'm using them for my local
> > processing now. They are absolutely the fastest tool I have found yet.
> > I can run the Consultants-HOWTO in about 4 seconds. Small howtos run
> > typically in subsecond times.
> >
>
> So people are clear - while xsltproc and libxml are being developed
> under the GNOME umbrella, they are not GNOME-specific. In fact, KDE is
> using them now for document processing as well. (In fact, KDE was
> first to use them for document processing.) To make this possible,
> Daniel Veillard, their author, added some backward compatibility so
> libxslt can be used to process DocBook sgml documents, even though
> they are not XML.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> John Fleck
> ####@####.#### (h), http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/
>
> _________________________
> http://list.linuxdoc.org/
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
