discuss: Re: The LDP guys no longer return my EMails
Subject:
Re: The LDP guys no longer return my EMails
From:
Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date:
28 Aug 2001 15:33:29 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108280828540.1119-100000@commandprompt.com>
>I would think the Linuxdoc SGML would be perfectly acceptable.
We prefer DocBook but we do allow LinuxDoc. Also the LDP has access to
DocParse which is a HTML to DocBook translation tool. DocParse works much
better than the LinuxDoc to HTML scripts.
>> submitted to LDP? How do we (the netfilter/iptables maintainers)
>> get them updated? Do the translators automatically get notices (e.g.
>> CVS commit logs) as soon as the english master is changed?
>
>Maybe someone else will be good enough to answer this.
You can either use our CVS or you can maintain it yourself. When you
perform and update, just email it to ####@####.####
J
>
>AFAIK, authors are encouraged to use CVS, but again it is not a
>requirement. As far as a formal submital, this can be done via LDP
>CVS, email with attachment, or email with URL. So if they are happy
>where they are, I don't see a reason to change this.
>
>Again, if I misspoke, Greg or David can correct me.
>
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
