discuss: Maintainer Tag?
Subject:
Re: Maintainer Tag?
From:
David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date:
8 Aug 2001 05:11:56 -0000
Message-Id: <20010807200240.C264@lafn.org>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:31:00AM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> David Lawyer ####@####.#### writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:55:33PM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> >> John Daily sent a response that made me aware of these (I assume you saw
> >> it as well):
> >>
> >> <authorgroup>
> >> <author role="maintainer" condition="current"> ... </author>
> >> <author role="author" condition="current">...</author>
> >> <author role="author" condition="original"> ... </author>
> >> <author role="author" condition="former"> ... </author>
> >> </authorgroup>
> >>
> > If this is become a standard for the LDP then linuxdoc needs to be
> > modified to support it (and translate this way into linuxdoc).
>
> Sorry, but I didn't get what you said here.
>
> This is the markup for DocBook. You're saying that Linuxdoc DTD should
> be modified to allow a similar markup? If you saying so, I agree with
> you.
>
> Is there anybody willing to hack the Linuxdoc DTD to support these?
Well, Taketoshi Sano added a translator and translator date tag to
linuxdoc. So he might be willing to add some more tags.
> Please, note that formatting tools should also be hacked to render
> these in a suitable way. (IIRC, Linuxdoc doesn't use DSSSL
> stylesheets...).
David Lawyer
