discuss: markups "simpler" than LinuxDoc
Subject:
Re: markups "simpler" than LinuxDoc
From:
Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date:
4 Aug 2001 19:12:49 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108041211000.29070-100000@commandprompt.com>
>linuxdoc also applies to docbook, that can't be said for sdf. So I
>wouldn't want to advise LDP writers to use sdf. If only it would
>convert directly to clean docbook.
Thats what we got HTML for :) We can convert HTML to DocBook. We can also
make HTML based templates that would convert to specific DocBook
Templates.
>
> David Lawyer
>
>_________________________
>http://list.linuxdoc.org/
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
