discuss: Inappropriate contents


Previous by date: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Robert
Next by date: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, James Hess
Previous in thread: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Robert
Next in thread: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, James Hess

Subject: Re: [discuss] Inappropriate contents
From: Rick Moen ####@####.####
Date: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000
Message-Id: <20091117034313.GF1982@linuxmafia.com>

Quoting Robert ####@####.####

> Look I think we all can agree that a classy picture of a nude person is  
> also considered pornography in the U.S. Perhaps in other countries this  
> isn't an issue, but it seems to be here in the U.S.

You and Charles Curley seem to be trying to anticipate points of
contention that some people, some day, might possibly differ over.
Seems to me like a case of a couple of guys really needing a hobby.

If you're unclear on what specifically Jean-Daniel is talking about
_today_, maybe you should ask him.

  

Previous by date: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Robert
Next by date: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, James Hess
Previous in thread: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Robert
Next in thread: 17 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, James Hess


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.