discuss: Inappropriate contents
Subject:
Re: [discuss] Inappropriate contents
From:
Rick Moen ####@####.####
Date:
16 Nov 2009 23:00:51 +0000
Message-Id: <20091116230033.GZ21475@linuxmafia.com>
Quoting Charles Curley ####@####.####
> Can LDP restrict the use of the LDP material in this way under the terms
> of the various licenses LDP contributors have used?
I'm unclear on why you're asking, since Jean-Daniel was not proposing to
deny anyone the right to host copies, but rather suggesting LDP's
non-cooperation with (what amount to) porn hosting sites.
> I also think you have a problem that the U.S. Supreme Court hasn't yet
> solved: please define pornography.
I also note that Jean-Daniel wasn't proposing to define pornography,
and doesn't need to. (He's not putting anyone on trial.)
The real world has nuance in it. Deal.
--
Rick Moen "If accuracy / Is what you crave /
####@####.#### Then you should call it / Myanmar Shave."
-- FakeAPStylebook
