discuss: Maintainer Tag?
Subject:
Re: Maintainer Tag?
From:
David Merrill ####@####.####
Date:
25 Jul 2001 20:50:39 -0000
Message-Id: <20010725164931.D13548@lupercalia.net>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:07:17AM -0700, ####@####.#### wrote:
> Well, the important thing is that we settle on **and
> document** a standard for doing this.
>
> There are far too many gray areas in the Author's
> Guide. We need to have a more consistent style of
> doing everything.
>
> Does anyone want to write up a little ``this is how
> and when you change / write the author/collab/editor
> tags'' diff to the LAG, or should I come out and
> propose something first?
Go ahead, please.
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Free Dmitri -> http://www.boycottadobe.com
Washington, DC Protest http://www.lupercalia.net/adobe/
Microsoft is banking on Windows 2000 to be a Trojan Horse - they want to get
this into companies and then start exploiting inter-relationships with the
product. But I always say: beware of geeks bearing gifts.
--Michael Gartenberg, Gartner Group Vice President.
