discuss: intro


Previous by date: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: intro, David Lawyer
Next by date: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: Advertisement banner on tldp.org?, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: intro, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: intro, David Lawyer

Subject: Re: [discuss] intro
From: "jdd for http://tldp.org" ####@####.####
Date: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000
Message-Id: <4964626F.2070004@dodin.org>

David Lawyer a écrit :

> One thing that needs to be put back in the manifesto is that LDP
> doesn't normally support documentation for one particular application.
> Such documentation is supposed to come with the application.  But if
> it doesn't or if it needs improvement and the maintainer(s) of the
> application software can't provide this, then someone can write an LDP
> doc for it.  And I suppose this is the case for the joe text editor.	

The Joe text editor doc on subject *is* on the LDP for years now, I
don't know how it come, but then we can keep it...

We can IMHO also have doc on single application if the doc have a
different point of view than the standard doc (we must have some added
value) - many official docs lack the "HOWTO" kind of doc.

jdd


-- 
jdd for the Linux Documentation Project
http://wiki.tldp.org
http://www.dodin.net
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1412160445

Previous by date: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: intro, David Lawyer
Next by date: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: Advertisement banner on tldp.org?, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: intro, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 7 Jan 2009 08:07:57 +0000 Re: intro, David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.