discuss: GUIDE in Wiki, example of the LVM-HOWTO
Subject:
Re: [discuss] GUIDE in Wiki, example of the LVM-HOWTO
From:
David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date:
18 Dec 2008 08:44:22 +0000
Message-Id: <20081218083514.GH2205@davespc>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:04:00PM +0200, Svetoslav Petkov Chukov wrote:
> I think LDP should classify the documents not the author. LDP is responsible
> for the quality of the documents, the author can suggest features, text,
> information, anything but LDP should take the care of this.
And just who in LDP is going to do this, given our shortage of
volunteers? The author knows what his doc contains better than
others. But since I'm not in favor of having classifications, then
there would be nothing to do. But if it has to have a classification,
I think the author could do it and if an LDP volunteer finds that it's
been misclassified, then it could be reclassified if the author agrees.
And if they don't agree? Then the LDP leader could decide, the
de-facto leader now being jdd.
David Lawyer
