discuss: LDP / KDP?
Subject:
Re: Fwd: Re: LDP / KDP?
From:
David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date:
19 Jul 2001 18:42:31 -0000
Message-Id: <20010719113238.C211@lafn.org>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:55:16PM -0700, ####@####.#### wrote:
> I was asked to forward this to the list, since the
> author is not subscribed.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:26:42 -0700
> From: Charles Samuels ####@####.####
> Subject: Re: LDP / KDP?
> To: ####@####.####
> Cc: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
> X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.2]
>
>
[snip]
> _still_, I like my format more, it seems like it'd be much easier to search,
> and I think the format is much more ideal than docbook (which I have worked
> with)
>
> e.g., an example data file: http://derkarl.org/kerneldoc/data/init_timer.kd
The kerneldoc format looks clearer to me than docbook, but it still
lacks the simplicity and compactness of linuxdoc. But unfortunately,
linuxdoc lacks the special tags "needed" for C code.
David Lawyer
