discuss: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?


Previous by date: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: LDP XSLT stylesheet (was Re: Gnome Help 2.0), David Merrill
Next by date: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: C-Programming HOWTO?, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, jdd
Next in thread: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, David Lawyer

Subject: Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?
From: David Merrill ####@####.####
Date: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000
Message-Id: <20010718192153.M13098@lupercalia.net>

On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 11:13:37PM -0700, David Lawyer wrote:
> Also I think that LinuxDoc needs to be promoted to the public at large
> as a simple way to write all kinds of short works using free software.
> It could be used by small business and organizations.  

No. It's a dead horse. Quit kicking it.

-- 
Dr. David C. Merrill                     http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project                   ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator            http://www.linuxdoc.org

It's possible, you can never know, that the universe exists only for me. If
so, it's going quite well I must admit.
	--Bill Gates

Previous by date: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: LDP XSLT stylesheet (was Re: Gnome Help 2.0), David Merrill
Next by date: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: C-Programming HOWTO?, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, jdd
Next in thread: 18 Jul 2001 23:22:18 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.