discuss: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?


Previous by date: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next by date: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Previous in thread: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next in thread: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler

Subject: Re: [discuss] DocBook Wiki--was it considered?
From: jdd ####@####.####
Date: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100
Message-Id: <48ABEE6B.4050203@dodin.org>

Martin Wheeler a écrit :
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, jdd wrote:
> 
>> I have seen concern about security.
> 
> Yup.  *Anything* php-based is potentially insecure -- and the developer of
> docbookwiki (Dasho) specifically mentions this in the documentation
> somewhere.
> 
>> I will investigate to know if docbookwiki
>> is still maintained
> 
> Yes; and no.  Yes, it is maintained; no it's not being developed any
> further.  Dasho is now concentrating on a better spin-off - docbookeasy.
> 
> Cheers,

I subscribed to the docbook-user list to keep in touch

jdd
-- 
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.org

Previous by date: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next by date: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Previous in thread: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next in thread: 20 Aug 2008 11:14:24 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.