discuss: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?


Previous by date: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next by date: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Previous in thread: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next in thread: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler

Subject: Re: [discuss] DocBook Wiki--was it considered?
From: jdd ####@####.####
Date: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100
Message-Id: <48A9DD6E.6060508@dodin.org>

Martin Wheeler a écrit :
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, jdd wrote:
> 
>>  as I'm not a debian user it would be better if any other admin could look
>> at this. If nobody can, I will try though
> 
> Nah -- I wouldn't.  Bitter personal experience has taught me that in this
> field you *really* have to know inside-out what software you've got
> installed on your machine; and where.

don't worry, I'm accutomed to do that, but it's a long process, that's 
why I' not that in a hurry to take it :-)

> Docbook systems are like that.  Sigh.

no so hard

> 
> [PS - And Linuxdoc systems are no better!]

I could work with linuxdoc before being able to write with vi :-). 
This one is *really easy* if you start with a template (much easier 
than pure html)

docbook is not difficult, it's only boring

jdd

-- 
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.org

Previous by date: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next by date: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Previous in thread: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler
Next in thread: 18 Aug 2008 21:37:21 +0100 Re: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?, Martin Wheeler


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.