discuss: DocBook Wiki--was it considered?
Subject:
Re: [discuss] DocBook Wiki--was it considered?
From:
Martin Wheeler ####@####.####
Date:
18 Aug 2008 20:12:13 +0100
Message-Id: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808182008060.6812@chaucer.startext.demon.co.uk>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, jdd wrote:
> as I'm not a debian user it would be better if any other admin could look
> at this. If nobody can, I will try though
Nah -- I wouldn't. Bitter personal experience has taught me that in this
field you *really* have to know inside-out what software you've got
installed on your machine; and where.
Otherwise you turn in circles, slowly going crazy trying to figure out
where the next link in the chain is.
Docbook systems are like that. Sigh.
[PS - And Linuxdoc systems are no better!]
--
Martin Wheeler - G5FM +44 1458 83-1103 - Glastonbury - BA6 9PH - England
####@####.#### http://martinwheeler.net/ http://avalonit.net/
GPG pub key : 01269BEB 6CAD BFFB DB11 653E B1B7 C62B AC93 0ED8 0126 9BEB
- Share your knowledge. It's a way of achieving immortality. -
