discuss: part of the review?


Previous by date: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, Anthony E. Greene
Next by date: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: Gnome Help 2.0, Nik Clayton
Previous in thread: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Anthony E. Greene
Next in thread: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Lawyer

Subject: Re: part of the review?
From: Nicolas Chauvat ####@####.####
Date: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107181032200.31099-100000@aries.logilab.fr>

[XML editors]

I suppose that this might be of interest too :

	http://idx-getox.idealx.org/

I think it was mentionned here before, but it's definitely not off-topic :-)

-- 
Nicolas Chauvat

http://www.logilab.com - "Mais où est donc Ornicar ?" - LOGILAB, Paris (France)


Previous by date: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, Anthony E. Greene
Next by date: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: Gnome Help 2.0, Nik Clayton
Previous in thread: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Anthony E. Greene
Next in thread: 18 Jul 2001 08:35:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.