discuss: Linux documentation


Previous by date: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Dan Scott
Next by date: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Michael Kerrisk
Previous in thread: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Dan Scott
Next in thread: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Michael Kerrisk

Subject: Re: [discuss] Linux documentation
From: Michael Kerrisk ####@####.####
Date: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000
Message-Id: <46F60A72.4080400@gmx.net>

Dan Scott wrote:
> As someone who has spent some time on the PHP documentation team -
> maintaining the user notes (weeding out incorrect or complete spam
> notes) takes a massive amount of effort. Be prepared to invest a great
> deal of time weeding out the useless notes to try and ensure that only
> the useful notes remain, if you decide to go this route. I believe the
> PostgreSQL folks have had a similar experience. The idea is great, in
> an ideal world; in practice, it's very demanding.

Thanks for the data point(s).  Over the last couple of years a few 
people have suggested to me that I create a wiki for man-pages.  I have 
resisted out of concern over that very issue (plus there are many other 
things that so far have taken a higher priority for man-pages).

Cheers,

Michael

Previous by date: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Dan Scott
Next by date: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Michael Kerrisk
Previous in thread: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Dan Scott
Next in thread: 23 Sep 2007 06:41:46 +0000 Re: Linux documentation, Michael Kerrisk


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.