discuss: Man pages converted to HTML


Previous by date: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik
Next by date: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik
Previous in thread: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik
Next in thread: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik

Subject: Re: [discuss] Man pages converted to HTML
From: "Sergiusz Pawlowicz" ####@####.####
Date: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000
Message-Id: <aea46f8f0706140222r67637074pcad03e18e5fc22fd@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/14/07, Sam Varshavchik ####@####.#### wrote:
> ####@####.#### writes:
>
> >> ####@####.#### writes:
> >>
> >>
> >> I interpreted David's message -- still quoted above -- as indicating there
> >> are some kind of controls to manage what gets mirrored, or not.  It looked
> >> to me like that there's two copies of the content -- one for www.tldp.org,
> >> and a separate copy that gets distributed to the mirrors. That, at least,
> >> is how I read David's message, and that's what I couldn't figure out by
> >> myself.
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > - Man pages were updated when I could "get around to it".
> >
> > - They used to be referenced from ibiblio.org (that's where you imply
> >   there were "two copies"); now they are part of the main site.
> >   Therefore, they are mirrored (as they fall under tldp.org). I made
> >   that change quite some time ago.
>
> Ok.
>
> Do we have any revision tracking for tldp.org's web content?

Not yet, because too less people work with www content.

> cvsview.tldp.org appears to hold just the various documents.  Or, if say, I
> wanted to update the latest man pages version number and link in docs.html,
> do I just fire up vi, and go for it? I don't think I've gotten any feedback
> on the man pages section reorg, and how we want to do it. Just
> double-checking.

Yes, vim is the solution :-)

> I might be having some kind of a problem with this list. I'm replying to a
> copy of your reply that was CCed directly to me, but I don't think that I
> received the original copy that went to discuss-list.
>
> My timestamp for your CC msg is 9:37am my time, today:
>
> Jun 13 09:37:20 headache courierd:
> started,id=00678017.466FF310.000068EC,from=<www!yourhostingaccount.com!SRS0=
> T9yyha=LN=fergusontechgroup.com=ldp>
>
> Grepping my logs, the last message I got from discuss-list was yesterday:
>
> Jun 12 18:30:43 headache courieruucp:
> id=006841A5.466F1E92.000018D1,from=<discuss-return-10364-mrsam=courier-mta.c
> ####@####.####
>
> That was my last list message, that you replied to. I don't see the list
> copy of your reply.

I hope Greg is not replying to the list, only to you.

S.

Previous by date: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik
Next by date: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik
Previous in thread: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik
Next in thread: 14 Jun 2007 09:22:08 -0000 Re: Man pages converted to HTML, Sam Varshavchik


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.