discuss: part of the review?


Previous by date: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Next by date: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: Green on black in HTML, Jorge Luiz Godoy Filho
Previous in thread: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Poet/Joshua Drake
Next in thread: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Poet/Joshua Drake

Subject: Re: part of the review?
From: David Merrill ####@####.####
Date: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000
Message-Id: <20010716192424.B6722@lupercalia.net>

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:23:43PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> >> I doubt any word processor will ever produce really good DocBook.
> 
> WordPerfect 2000 creates excellent DocBook.

Well, I'm surprised. iirc that's the Windows version only, though,
right?

-- 
Dr. David C. Merrill                     http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project                   ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator            http://www.linuxdoc.org

When people understand what Microsoft is up to, they're outraged.
	--Tim O'Reilly, O'Reilly & Associates

Previous by date: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Next by date: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: Green on black in HTML, Jorge Luiz Godoy Filho
Previous in thread: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Poet/Joshua Drake
Next in thread: 16 Jul 2001 23:24:49 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Poet/Joshua Drake


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.