discuss: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?
Subject:
Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook, was Re: part of the review?
From:
David Merrill ####@####.####
Date:
16 Jul 2001 23:20:25 -0000
Message-Id: <20010716192000.A6722@lupercalia.net>
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 10:11:35PM -0700, David Lawyer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:22:50PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are never going to get anywhere with this David. It is purely opinion.
> > On one hand, we have the opinion of major publishers and documentation
> > projects that using DocBook is a good choice.
> A good choice for them but not for volunteers who may only write a
> few pages.
>
> Some things are facts:
Even if linuxdoc is simpler, it has nothing else going for it. It is
technically inferior.
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of
Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the
shaking becomes a warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in
motion.
