discuss: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion
Subject:
Re: [discuss] TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot
discussion
From:
Andy Oram ####@####.####
Date:
22 Apr 2007 12:36:20 -0000
Message-Id: <3977292.15541177245392862.JavaMail.root@ball.east.ora.com>
The problems discussed on this thread sound all too familiar. First, TLDP is a victim of its own success: it created a huge set of documents and people began to expect that they'd be updated and that the set would keep increasing.
Updating a document is a lot less fun than writing it the first time. I found that out doing some free docs. I was not a very reliable updater, I have to admit.
And part of it is the old free-rider problem.
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergiusz Pawlowicz" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 8:10:59 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: [discuss] TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion
On 4/22/07, jdd ####@####.#### wrote:
> Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
>
> > I can see every discuss threads about LDP are very active apart
> > from documentation process and documentation itself.
> >
> > We need strategy, not red tape.
<snip>
