discuss: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion
Subject:
Re: [discuss] TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion
From:
"Sergiusz Pawlowicz" ####@####.####
Date:
22 Apr 2007 11:08:39 -0000
Message-Id: <aea46f8f0704220408o4740abf0o2ef89ff9600c8df2@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/22/07, David Lawyer ####@####.#### wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 01:00:58PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > Five years ago the LDP was the place to go when you needed accurate
> > documentation that focused on one particular aspect of Linux .. As a
> > result, or was it also a cause, of this popularity .. the LDP was the
> > place where authors wanted to be published.
>
> Wrong. 7 years ago I sat at the LDP booth in Montreal and almost
> every visitor complained about stale documentation at LDP.
> Unfortunately, it's even worse now.
Everybody complained, noone helped... This is a problem.
I can see every discuss threads about LDP are very active apart
from documentation process and documentation itself.
We need strategy, not red tape.
S.
